Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:15
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Should You Do Cardio or Weights First? We Finally Have an Answer. - ScienceAlert
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Lawsuit says mayor called people who opposed Buc-ee's project 'terrorists' - 9News
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Davante Adams feels rejuvenated: Joining Rams was "exactly what I needed" - NBC Sports
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
New Report Details Knicks’ Jalen Brunson Concern Before Firing Tom Thibodeau - Sports Illustrated
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Dermot Mulroney, wife Prima Apollinaare to divorce after nearly 15 years of marriage - USA Today